Search Page
Save citations to file
Email citations
Send citations to clipboard
Add to Collections
Add to My Bibliography
Create a file for external citation management software
Your saved search
Your RSS Feed
Filters
Results by year
Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.
Year | Number of Results |
---|---|
2008 | 1 |
2009 | 1 |
2016 | 1 |
2024 | 0 |
Search Results
2 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Did you mean
queenstown scale【岩】
(10 results)?
Effect of confining pressure on diffusion coefficients in clay-rich, low-permeability sedimentary rocks.
J Contam Hydrol. 2016 Dec;195:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
J Contam Hydrol. 2016.
PMID: 27838596
Four samples representing different formations and lithologies in the Michigan Basin were studied: Queenston Formation shale, Georgian Bay Formation shale, Cobourg Formation limestone and Cobourg Formation argillaceous limestone. ...Decreases in D(e) were lar …
Four samples representing different formations and lithologies in the Michigan Basin were studied: Queenston Formation shale, …
A technique for estimating one-dimensional diffusion coefficients in low-permeability sedimentary rock using X-ray radiography: comparison with through-diffusion measurements.
Cavé L, Al T, Xiang Y, Vilks P.
Cavé L, et al.
J Contam Hydrol. 2009 Jan 7;103(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
J Contam Hydrol. 2009.
PMID: 18838191
To evaluate the radiography method, results were compared with traditional steady-state through-diffusion measurements on two rock types: shale and limestone. Values of D(p) of (4.8+/-2.5)x10(-11) m(2).s(-1) (mean+/-standard deviation) were measured for samples of Queen …
To evaluate the radiography method, results were compared with traditional steady-state through-diffusion measurements on two rock types: …
Item in Clipboard
Cite
Cite